Dharmaraju sincerely listened to what all sanjaya told him. he started to reply in calm and composed manner.Dharmaraju enquired if Sanjaya could identify enmity in his words instead of truce.if we could resolve this issue without banging each others heads, would anyone prefer enmity? would it not be foolish on our part to go for war if things were so easy to be settled?
if at all,dhrutharashtra had that fatherly affection towards us, would he really throw us out of his kingdom?is it justified on his part for his behaviour full of partiality?it looks as if saying that full meals for them and betel leaves for us?generally we go for them only after we take full meals.all of us,including you know the behaviour and line of thought of Dhrutharashtra. it is never new.at least,you dont talk with partiality.be fair for both of us.if Dhrutha rashtra was ever fair enough ,he could have at least given us Indraprastha or some other place.we have sree Krishna to direct us the right path.he knows what is right and what is wrong.he is our master.regarding our moves, we would act according to his directions.that is it!!!
if at all,dhrutharashtra had that fatherly affection towards us, would he really throw us out of his kingdom?is it justified on his part for his behaviour full of partiality?it looks as if saying that full meals for them and betel leaves for us?generally we go for them only after we take full meals.all of us,including you know the behaviour and line of thought of Dhrutharashtra. it is never new.at least,you dont talk with partiality.be fair for both of us.if Dhrutha rashtra was ever fair enough ,he could have at least given us Indraprastha or some other place.we have sree Krishna to direct us the right path.he knows what is right and what is wrong.he is our master.regarding our moves, we would act according to his directions.that is it!!!
No comments:
Post a Comment